U.S. Sparks Outrage with Reported Plan to Denaturalize 25 Million Citizens
The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has unveiled a new directive under former President Donald Trump’s administration that could potentially strip up to 25 million naturalized citizens of their U.S. citizenship. This development stems from a recently leaked internal memo that prioritizes the civil denaturalization of individuals who allegedly obtained citizenship through fraud, misrepresentation, or by concealing material facts.
While the DOJ has yet to initiate mass proceedings, the policy framework, publicized in late June 2025, has ignited fierce backlash and reopened debates on immigration, xenophobia, and the very meaning of citizenship in the United States.
What Is Denaturalization?
Denaturalization is the legal process through which the U.S. government revokes the citizenship of individuals who were not born in the country but became Americans through naturalization. Historically, this has been used sparingly, often reserved for people who committed war crimes, acts of terrorism, or obtained their citizenship through extreme fraud.
However, under the Trump-era memo, the criteria are far broader—and the implications more chilling.
Inside the DOJ Memo: Who’s at Risk?
The June 11 memo urges prosecutors to pursue denaturalization in civil courts where the burden of proof is significantly lower than in criminal cases. The document reportedly outlines five broad categories of individuals who could be targeted:
- Those who committed fraud during the naturalization process, including omitting minor offenses or misstatements.
- Individuals tied to violent crimes or financial crimes—even if those crimes occurred after gaining citizenship.
- People with alleged terrorist affiliations, past or present.
- Those accused of being a threat to national security.
- Immigrants who joined gangs or extremist groups, even after being naturalized.
Critics argue that the scope of this policy is dangerously vague and could lead to selective enforcement based on race, religion, or political ideology.
Why the Backlash?
Civil rights groups, legal experts, and immigrant advocates have condemned the memo as a direct attack on the principle of equal citizenship. One of the most controversial aspects is the fact that civil denaturalization cases do not guarantee legal representation—meaning a person could lose their citizenship and risk deportation without ever being appointed a lawyer.
A Harvard immigration attorney, Maria Chen, likened the move to “building a second-class status for naturalized citizens,” warning that it weaponizes bureaucracy against vulnerable populations.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), along with dozens of other organizations, has vowed to fight the implementation in court, calling it a “deeply un-American” policy.
Historical Precedent
While denaturalization has existed in U.S. law since the 1900s, it has rarely been used. During the McCarthy era, it was weaponized against alleged communists. More recently, under President Obama, a program called “Operation Janus” reviewed thousands of cases, but only a few hundred were acted upon. Under Trump’s first administration (2017–2021), there was already a noticeable increase in civil denaturalization filings, and this memo represents a more aggressive and unapologetic expansion of that effort.
Nigerians and Global Immigrants React
With Nigeria ranking among the top ten countries for U.S. immigration, the announcement has sparked concern within the Nigerian-American community. Many fear that even long-standing, law-abiding citizens could be unfairly targeted based on minor mistakes in their immigration records, or simply due to heightened scrutiny of immigrants from “non-preferred countries.”
A Nigerian-born U.S. Marine veteran, who asked to remain anonymous, said:
“I fought for this country in Afghanistan, paid taxes, and raised my family here. The thought that someone could review my file and decide I no longer belong—it’s terrifying.”
Legal Ramifications
Unlike criminal denaturalization, which requires “beyond reasonable doubt,” civil denaturalization only requires ‘clear and convincing evidence’. This subtle legal distinction drastically increases the DOJ’s ability to strip citizenship without the rigorous protections of criminal courts.
Even more troubling is the lack of access to court-appointed lawyers, making it far more likely for poor or underrepresented individuals to lose their citizenship simply because they can’t afford a strong legal defense.
Is This Constitutional?
While the Constitution does not prohibit denaturalization, legal scholars argue that such widespread targeting violates the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection under the law. There are also questions about whether the policy creates two separate classes of citizens—those born in the U.S. and those who were naturalized.
Many fear that the move is a slippery slope toward a more authoritarian vision of citizenship, where naturalization becomes conditional and revocable.
Global Implications
If enforced widely, this policy could:
- Erode America’s global image as a safe haven and democratic leader.
- Discourage highly skilled immigrants from settling in the U.S.
- Trigger international diplomatic tensions, especially with allies whose citizens may be affected.
Several governments, including Canada, Germany, and Nigeria, are reportedly monitoring the situation and may issue formal statements if mass denaturalization cases begin.
Final Thoughts
This is not just a legal or political issue, it’s a moral one. For many immigrants, American citizenship is a hard-earned badge of belonging. The thought that it can be revoked, sometimes for small clerical errors, turns that badge into a fragile label.
While the DOJ insists that only fraudsters and criminals are targeted, the ambiguity in enforcement and precedent for abuse makes this policy one of the most alarming developments in modern U.S. immigration history.
The question now is not whether denaturalization is legal, it’s whether it’s just.
If you enjoyed this article, click here to read more informative posts, also check us out on Instagram for fun and engaging content.
Disclaimer: The opinions, views, and information expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy, position, or views of iNaijanow. The company assumes no liability for any errors, omissions, or damages arising from the use of this information.
